/bi-/ might have been stated to own locative-terminative force as opposed to purely locative push to own gaydar sign up /ba-/, however, Thomsen says into the p. 184, it “is probably maybe not instantly useful the reason out-of concord having a beneficial loc.-identity. otherwise loc. noun, however it instead serves this new semantic distinction of your verb. “
>ba(I): possess a great separative form. In OBGT it directly correlates having >Akkadian t-stems. (Thomsen, pursuing the Jacobsen, confuses t-stems >for the Akkadian primary.) Their reputation are shortly after the brand new ventive >marker yards and then the b is actually absorbed: m-ba- > m-ma, assuming this is certainly >accompanied by a 2nd individual pronoun, it gets meters-ma > m-mu (very ba >isn’t necessarily simple to spot). Regarding the absence of the brand new >ventive marker they uses up the first reputation throughout the strings, immediately after which they >try not to continually be notable of ba(II). A definite case is >ba-ne-su8-be2-durante-de3-durante = ni-it-tal2-lak cu-nu-ci = i disappear completely >in it (OBGT VII, 305). > >ba(II): keeps an excellent stative/inactive form. Inside OBGT VI, it is made of the >a c-stalk stative/inactive, or a keen Nt-stalk passive. Frequently, ba(II) >takes up the initial updates on the chain. ba-ab-gar, ba-ab-gar-re-dentro de >= cuckun, cuckunaku = he has got become put / I was set >(by the people unnamed). The brand new models ba-gar, ba-gar-re-en, . ba-na-gar, >ba-na-gar-re-dentro de within the OBGT VI, outlines 160-165, is actually confusing; they could >instead be interpreted once the ba(I), particularly the 2nd series, >that’s two-new member, as well as the OB grammarian, whom rendered him or her >from the Nt-stalk passives, and maintained this new ambiguity. > >Their declaration clearly applies to ba(II), but I do not think it is simply an excellent >matter of liking, after you have put ba(I) apart. Of course, it is >ways outside my information and you will my personal ability to check on my personal more than >syntactical/lexical claims from unilingual messages. > >With my best regards, >Peter J. Huber
I thought of the many intransitive phrases one to prevent with ba-Means, particularly ba-gul, “it actually was destroyed”. Since you say, those fall in the category out of ba(II).
I’d has actually consider it was a great >Hebrew word, but then once again, I am not sure the partnership of your Sumerian >language as well as the Hebrew language
Many thanks for making the effort to attempt to describe which point. I could make an effort to synopsis what Hayes is wearing profiles 162 and you can 256: The guy believes that scholars provides speculated that there could be a couple of ba- conjugation prefixes that will be homonyms. “One is viewed chiefly inside the inactive sentences, others within the faster definable contexts.” Plus, the newest conjugation prefix bi2- often happen that have nominal phrases from the locative-terminative circumstances as well as the conjugation prefix ba- sometimes occurs which have nominal sentences throughout the locative instance. “It is primarily the development away from co-occurrence which includes contributed several scholars to summarize one bi2- and you may ba- aren’t of the same review as most other conjugation prefixes, and are generally probably including several ability.” Therefore one particular ba- start around an element that represents the brand new locative circumstances. To have a good separative meaning, you would expect to get Sumerian affordable phrases conclude into ablative postposition -ta.
Note the fresh subdued huge difference >produced in OBGT VI, lines 79-84, within typical Grams-stem stative >while the C-base stative/passive: an-gar, an-gar-re-dentro de = cakin, >caknaku = he’s place, I am set, versus
>I found myself wondering for people who you’ll address a concern personally. We have comprehend somewhere >that the label “Eden” are an excellent Sumerian term. > >Anyway, if Paradise, Adam, and/or Eve try Sumerian words, do you really >delight let me know if they have an interpretation/definition?
EDIN was a great Sumerian term, it is the steppe land between the two rivers, where in fact the herd pets grazed.